If you’re a Florida (or Michigan) resident suing the Democratic National Committee because their primary rules have disenfranchised you, it might be helpful to allege that you actually voted. From pages 6-7 of today’s 11th Circuit opinion in DiMaio v. DNC (citations omitted):
Notably, DiMaio never alleged that he actually voted, nor even so much as suggested that he intended to vote in the Florida Democratic primary. To the contrary, the complaint simply “posit[ed]” that the DNC “may be violating his rights under Article II and the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution”; that enforcement of the DNC’s delegate-stripping rules “may or may not violate [his] right to vote in a Presidential primary”; and that, “[i]f the decision of the National Party violates [his] constitutional rights, it would be appropriate for this court to make such a finding.” As if to underscore the conditional nature of his injury, he also alleged that “[i]f the decision of the National Party does not violate the Plaintiff’s constitutional rights, it would be appropriate for this court to make such a finding . . . .”
These allegations, whether standing alone or in concert, do not plead that the plaintiff suffered an injury in fact, the invasion of a legally protected interest that is concrete and particularized” — the first prong of the Lujan test. As a practical matter, DiMaio’s right to vote, protected by the Fourteenth Amendment, cannot be impaired by the DNC’s failure to consider a ballot that he did not cast in the first place.
(H/T: How Appealing)
