Comments on: SCOTUS Fantasy League http://fightthehypo.com/2009/11/13/scotus-fantasy-league/ a law student blog written by students at the catholic university of america, columbus school of law ::fighting the hypo, so you don't have to:: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:27:11 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: IDea http://fightthehypo.com/2009/11/13/scotus-fantasy-league/comment-page-1/#comment-1333 IDea Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:33:02 +0000 http://fightthehypo.com/?p=908#comment-1333 This is really dumb. I don't know why anyone would want to spend time doing this. This is really dumb. I don’t know why anyone would want to spend time doing this.

]]> By: Christopher http://fightthehypo.com/2009/11/13/scotus-fantasy-league/comment-page-1/#comment-1329 Christopher Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:12:41 +0000 http://fightthehypo.com/?p=908#comment-1329 I'll bet you could land a federal clerkship by winning this thing. I’ll bet you could land a federal clerkship by winning this thing.

]]> By: TDot http://fightthehypo.com/2009/11/13/scotus-fantasy-league/comment-page-1/#comment-1318 TDot Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:55:35 +0000 http://fightthehypo.com/?p=908#comment-1318 Another productivity-killer to add to my list of distractions -- thanks for posting this :) Another productivity-killer to add to my list of distractions — thanks for posting this :)

]]> By: Dr. Bombay http://fightthehypo.com/2009/11/13/scotus-fantasy-league/comment-page-1/#comment-1317 Dr. Bombay Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:37:44 +0000 http://fightthehypo.com/?p=908#comment-1317 This had the potential to be one of the greatest ideas anyone has ever come up with. Here's why I think it's lacking. Given the make up of the High Court, picking the spread based on the content of the case should no be too hard. What would be truly fantastic is if you could have access to a series of prop bets on all the crazy things the Supreme's do in any given term. Over/under on how many times Scalia/Stevens get into it. Month and day that Thomas speaks in oral argument. It would be glorious. This had the potential to be one of the greatest ideas anyone has ever come up with. Here’s why I think it’s lacking. Given the make up of the High Court, picking the spread based on the content of the case should no be too hard.

What would be truly fantastic is if you could have access to a series of prop bets on all the crazy things the Supreme’s do in any given term. Over/under on how many times Scalia/Stevens get into it. Month and day that Thomas speaks in oral argument. It would be glorious.

]]>